Neoadjuvant-Adjuvant vs Neoadjuvant-Only PD-1 and PD-L1 Inhibitors for Patients With Resectable NSCLC: An Indirect Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Neoadjuvant therapy combining programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors with platinum-based chemotherapy has demonstrated significant improvement in pathologic response and survival rates among patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it remains controversial whether PD-1 blockade therapy given before and after surgery (neoadjuvant-adjuvant treatment) is associated with better outcomes than when given only before surgery (neoadjuvant-only treatment). Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety associated with neoadjuvant-adjuvant anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapy with neoadjuvant-only anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapy for patients with resectable NSCLC. Data Sources: A systematic search was conducted across databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, as well as major oncology conferences, through July 31, 2023. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials comparing neoadjuvant-adjuvant or neoadjuvant-only PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitor therapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable NSCLC were selected. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline, 2 authors independently extracted data. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted and then pooled through the generic inverse-variance methods. Relative risks (RRs) for treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were derived via the Mantel-Haenszel method. Using chemotherapy as a common comparator, indirect comparisons between neoadjuvant-adjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant-only immunotherapy were conducted using frequentist methods. A random or fixed model was used based on intertrial heterogeneity identified through the Cochran Q test. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was EFS, with secondary outcomes including OS and TRAEs. Results: The study encompassed 4 trials of neoadjuvant-adjuvant immunotherapy and 1 trial of neoadjuvant-only immunotherapy, involving 2385 patients. Direct meta-analysis revealed significant improvements in EFS for both neoadjuvant-adjuvant and neoadjuvant-only immunotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone. In indirect meta-analysis, the addition of adjuvant immunotherapy to neoadjuvant immunotherapy was not associated with improved EFS (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.63-1.30; P = .59) or OS (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.73-1.90; P = .51) compared with neoadjuvant-only immunotherapy. Moreover, the incidence of any grade of TRAEs significantly increased with the addition of adjuvant immunotherapy (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.17; P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: This meta-analysis suggests that adding PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors in the adjuvant phase to neoadjuvant treatment with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors and chemotherapy may not improve survival outcomes for patients with resectable NSCLC and may be associated with increased adverse events. Future validation of these findings is warranted through head-to-head randomized clinical trials.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma involving the nasopharynx: An easily misdiagnosed disease with atypical histopathological features.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the clinicopathologic features, treatment, and survival outcomes of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) involving the nasopharynx. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 73 cases of AITL. Among them, 64 cases with complete pre-treatment 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images were integrated into the analysis of clinical characteristics and PET/CT findings of AITL involving the nasopharynx; 14 cases with both biopsies from lymph node and nasopharynx were included in the comparison of pathological characteristics of AITL in the two areas. Forty-six of the 73 patients who received first-line systemic treatment at our institute were included in the treatment efficacy and survival analyses. RESULTS: Nasopharyngeal involvement was seen in 44/64 (68.8%) patients. Histologically, lymph node and nasopharyngeal biopsies in 14 patients both showed small to medium-sized tumor cells, complex inflammatory infiltration, and Reed-Sternberg-like cells or B immunoblasts. However, tumor cells with clear cytoplasm, significant high endothelial venule (HEV) hyperplasia, and perivascular infiltration were observed in 5/14, 3/14, and 2/14 nasopharyngeal biopsies, respectively, but in all fourteen lymph node biopsies (P < 0.05). Immunophenotypic profiles and gene rearrangements were highly concordant. Treatment efficacy and survival were similar between patients with nasopharyngeal involvement and those without (P > 0.05), indicating nasopharyngeal involvement is not a prognostic factor for AITL patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nasopharyngeal involvement is common in AITL but can be easily misdiagnosed because of its atypical pathologic pattern, especially when a lymph node biopsy is unavailable. However, the patient's clinical presentation, PET/CT manifestations, the typical immunophenotype, and gene rearrangements help the diagnosis.

Impact of prophylactic dexamethasone on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced Non-Squamous Non-Small-Cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Baseline corticosteroids exposure is associated with inferior clinical outcomes in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) axis blockade. Dexamethasone is a potent corticosteroid used in the prevention of chemotherapy-associated adverse events (CAAEs). OBJECTIVE: Since dexamethasone has immunosuppressive properties, this study attempted to elucidate its effects on the efficacy of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy in patients with non-squamous NSCLC. METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 254 advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients who received front-line treatment with a PD-1 pathway inhibitor and platinum-based chemotherapy at three academic institutions. The average dosage of prophylactic dexamethasone per chemotherapy cycle was calculated. Patients were divided into three groups based on the dose of dexamethasone: High-d (≥24 mg), Moderate-d (12-24 mg), and Low-d (<12 mg). Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess the correlation between the dosage of dexamethasone and progression-free survival (PFS). Logistic regression was used to assess the correlation between dexamethasone dosage and the occurrence of immune related adverse effects (irAE). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the differences in survival among the different dexamethasone dosage groups. RESULT: The dosage of prophylactic dexamethasone was not significantly correlated with PFS (Spearman's rho = -0.103, P = 0.098). Results from the univariate [hazard ratio (HR)Low-d/High-d, 1.00; P = 0.997; HRModerate-d/High-d, 0.85; P = 0.438] and multivariate (HRLow-d/High-d, 0.71; P = 0.174; HRModerate-d/High-d, 0.87; P = 0.512) analyses showed no significant association between dexamethasone and PFS. Dexamethasone did not have significant effect on the objective response rate, disease control rate or overall survival. The toxicity profiles of irAE were similar across all three groups. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that the use of prophylactic dexamethasone does not have an adverse effect on the clinical outcomes of non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 blockade therapy and chemotherapy. Routine use of dexamethasone for preventing CAAEs should be recommended for patients undergoing combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Tumor response assessment by measuring the single largest lesion per organ in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor.

Background: For Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST1.1), measuring up to two target lesions per organ is an arbitrary criterion. Objectives: We sought to compare response assessment using RECIST1.1 and modified RECIST1.1 (mRECIST1.1, measuring the single largest lesion per organ) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. Methods: Concordance of radiologic response categorization between RECIST1.1 and mRECIST1.1 was compared using the Kappa statistics. C-index was calculated to evaluate prognostic accuracy of radiologic response by the two criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were conducted for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Eighty-seven patients who had at least two target lesions in any organ per the RECIST1.1 were eligible for comparison analysis. Tumor response showed excellent concordance when measured using the RECIST1.1 and mRECIST1.1 (Kappa = 0.961). C-index by these two criteria was similar for PFS (0.784 versus 0.785) and OS (0.649 versus 0.652). Responders had significantly longer PFS and OS versus non-responders (p < 0.05), whichever criterion adopted. Radiologic response remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS in multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The mRECIST1.1 was comparable to RECIST1.1 in response assessment among aNSCLC patients who received single-agent PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor. The mRECIST1.1, with reduced number of lesions to be measured, may be sufficient and more convenient to assess antitumor activity in clinical practice.

Adjuvant therapy in completely resected, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative analysis of treatment efficacy between EGFR-TKI and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy.

The IMpower010 and KEYNOTE-091 trials have demonstrated the benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy (IO) after chemotherapy (C+IO) in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including those with epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutation. Meanwhile, several studies have reported that EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) may prolong disease-free survival (DFS) in these patients. However, there is currently a lack of head-to-head comparison between these two adjuvant therapy strategies. Therefore, we designed a comparative analysis of their efficacy to inform clinical decision-making by assessing DFS as the primary outcome. The results of direct meta-analysis indicated that EGFR-TKI reduced the risk of recurrence and/or death in completely resected NSCLC (HREGFR-TKI/chemo = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.74, p=0.003), while C+IO did not significantly improve DFS compared with chemotherapy alone (HRC+IO/chemo=0.68, 95% CI: 0.31 to 1.50, p=0.338). Indirect comparison suggested that EGFR-TKI has a trend to prolong DFS compared with C+IO (HR EGFR-TKI/C+IO = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.23 to 1.61, p=0.312), while the third-generation TKI (3rd-TKI) osimertinib significantly outperformed C+IO (HR3rd-TKI/C+IO = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.70, p=0.006). In conclusion, osimertinib rather than immunotherapy should be regarded as the preferred adjuvant therapy in completely resected, EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Detection of Human Papillomavirus DNA, E6/E7 Messenger RNA, and p16INK4a in Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The etiologic link between human papillomavirus (HPV) and lung cancer is still controversial. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to December 2020 to identify studies on the infection of HPV in lung cancer. We calculated the attributable proportion of HPV in lung cancer by pooling the infection of cases positive for both HPV DNA and biomarkers of carcinogenesis that may be induced by HPV (E6/E7 messenger RNA or p16INK4a). RESULTS: A total of 117 studies, comprising data of 12 616 lung cancer cases from 22 countries across 5 continents, were included. The overall HPV DNA positivity in primary lung cancer cases worldwide was 16.4% (95% confidence interval, 12.7%-20.5%). HPV DNA positivity of lung cancer varied significantly by pathological type and geographic region. Notably, the expression rate of p16INK4a is significantly higher than the positivity of HPV DNA and of HPV E6/E7 mRNA (P < .05). The estimate of HPV attributable proportion defined by expression of E6/E7 mRNA was 0 and of p16INK4a was 7.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The data in this systematic review is robust enough to contradict the possible participation of HPV in lung cancer carcinogenesis. Prophylactic vaccines targeting HPV cannot have the potential to prevent lung cancer.

Machine learning-based risk model incorporating tumor immune and stromal contexture predicts cancer prognosis and immunotherapy efficacy.

The immune and stromal contexture within the tumor microenvironment (TME) interact with cancer cells and jointly determine disease process and therapeutic response. We aimed at developing a risk scoring model based on TME-related genes of squamous cell lung cancer to predict patient prognosis and immunotherapeutic response. TME-related genes were identified through exploring genes that correlated with immune scores and stromal scores. LASSO-Cox regression model was used to establish the TME-related risk scoring (TMErisk) model. A TMErisk model containing six genes was established. High TMErisk correlated with unfavorable OS in LUSC patients and this association was validated in multiple NSCLC datasets. Genes involved in pathways associated with immunosuppressive microenvironment were enriched in the high TMErisk group. Tumors with high TMErisk showed elevated infiltration of immunosuppressive cells. High TMErisk predicted worse immunotherapeutic response and prognosis across multiple carcinomas. TMErisk model could serve as a robust biomarker for predicting OS and immunotherapeutic response.

Continuation of anti-PD-1 therapy plus physician-choice treatment beyond first progression is not associated with clinical benefit in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Objective: Few data are available on the optimal treatment options after disease progression from first-line treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy. This study aimed to describe the safety and efficacy of continuing ICIs beyond first progress disease (PD) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Patients with NSCLC previously treated with first-line anti-PD-1 antibody plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy and hence had PD as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1 were enrolled. For the subsequent line, patients received physician's choice (PsC) with or without an anti-PD-1 antibody. The primary outcome was progression-free survival after second-line treatment (PFS2). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) from the initiation of first-line treatment, post-second-progression survival (P2PS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety during second-line treatment. Results: Between July 2018 and January 2021, 59 patients were included. A total of 33 patients received a physician-decided second-line regimen plus ICIs (PsC plus ICIs group), and 26 patients did not continue ICIs (PsC group). There was no significant difference in PFS2 between the PsC plus ICIs group and the PsC group (median, 6.5 vs. 5.7 months, p = 0.46). median OS (28.8 vs. 29.2 months), P2PS (13.4 vs. 18.7 months), ORR (18.2% vs. 19.2%), and DCR (78.8% vs, 84.6%) were also similar between the two groups. No new safety signals were observed. Conclusion: In this real-world setting, patients treated with continued ICIs beyond their first disease progression did not experience clinical benefit but without compromising safety.

LRRC3B and its promoter hypomethylation status predicts response to anti-PD-1 based immunotherapy.

Background: The leucine rich repeat containing 3B (LRRC3B) gene is a tumor suppressor gene involved in the anti-tumor immune microenvironment. Expression of LRRC3B and DNA methylation at the LRRC3B promoter region may serve as a useful marker to predict response to anti-PD-1 therapy. However, no studies have yet systematically explored the protective role of LRRC3B methylation in tumor progression and immunity. Methods: Expression of LRRC3B of 33 cancer types in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was downloaded from UCSC Xena (http://xena.ucsc.edu/). And, we evaluated the differential expression of LRRC3B according to tumor stage, overall survival, and characteristics of the tumor microenvironment. The immunotherapeutic cohorts included IMvigor21, GSE119144, and GSE72308 which were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. We conducted pearson correlation analysis of LRRC3B and tumor microenvironment (TME) in pan-cancer. Also, six immune cell types (B cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and dendritic cells) and tumor purity were analyzed using the Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource (TIMER1.0) (Tumor IMmune Estimation Resource (TIMER2.0). And, a "silencing score" model base on LRRC3B promoter methylation to predict overall survival (OS) by multivariate Cox regression analysis was constructed. Finally, the model was applied to predict anti-PD-1 therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and breast cancer (BRCA). Results: LRRC3B expression associated with less tumor invasion, less severe tumor stage, and decreased metastasis. The inactivation of LRRC3B promoted the enrichment of immuneosuppressive cells, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), M2 subtype of tumor-associated macrophages (M2-TAMs), M1 subtype of tumor-associated macrophages (M1-TAMs), and regulatory T (Treg) cells. A high silencing score was significantly associated with immune inhibition, low expression of LRRC3B, poor patient survival, and activation of cancer-related pathways. Conclusion: Our comprehensive analysis demonstrated the potential role of LRRC3B in the anti-tumor microenvironment, clinicopathological features of cancer, and disease prognosis. It suggested that LRRC3B methylation could be used as a powerful biomarker to predict immunotherapy responses in NSCLC and BRCA.

Optimizing the tumor shrinkage threshold for evaluating immunotherapy efficacy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The rise of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in recent years has coincided with unusual clinical response patterns. Modification of the sum of longest diameters (SLD)-based threshold that reflecting dynamic change of the tumor burden and predicting response to ICIs, may markedly improve current treatment regimens. METHODS: The baseline and post-treatment SLD of target lesion was recorded and the maximum percent change of the SLD from baseline was designated as SLD-change score. The optimal cut-off value was obtained using the X-tile program. The relationship between SLD-change score and survival outcome (PFS, OS) was evaluated. RESULTS: 10% cut-off value of SLD-change score was found to be most distinctive for PFS. Responders defined according to this cut-off value showed a significant improvement for PFS and OS. Bone metastasis and brain metastasis were also two independent prognostic factors of PFS and OS, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 10% SLD change score could discriminate for ICIs treatment response, which holds great promise in promoting the development of precise immunotherapeutic strategy.

Second-line treatment options in advanced thymic carcinoma after failure of platinum-based chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Currently there is no standard therapy recommended for second-line treatment for thymic carcinoma. Our study compared multidrug chemotherapy, single-agent chemotherapy, and PD-1 inhibitors in patients diagnosed with advanced thymic carcinoma who had previous platinum-based chemotherapy at the clinic. METHODS: The study included patients with thymic carcinoma who failed first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier methods were applied in the study for estimating the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves. Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact chi-square test was adopted to make comparisons of the objective response rate (ORR) between treatment groups. Cox regression was used for the multivariate analyses in PFS and OS. RESULTS: Among the 92 patients enrolled, multidrug chemotherapy was used in 51 (55.4%) patients for second-line therapy. Thirty-six patients (35.9%) received single-agent chemotherapy, and eight patients (8.7%) underwent PD-1 inhibitors. The multidrug chemotherapy group showed better efficacy than the other two groups, with an ORR of 35.3% (p = 0.006). The median PFS of multidrug chemotherapy, single-agent chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors were 5.0 months, 3.0 months, and 4.0 months, respectively (p = 0.008). Patients in the multidrug chemotherapy group also showed an advantage in OS in comparison with the other two treatment groups (p = 0.045), with a median OS of 30.4 months. Multivariate analysis showed that second-line treatment was independent factor for both PFS (p = 0.035) and OS (p = 0.037). Grade 3-4 AEs were mostly detected in patients receiving multidrug chemotherapy and were primarily hematologic. Treatment-related mortality was not found in any of the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Multidrug chemotherapy had a trend toward a more positive response rate and outcomes in longer survival time than single-agent chemotherapy and PD-1 inhibitors. Multidrug chemotherapy is a choice worth considering for second-line therapy in patients with thymic carcinoma if tolerable.

[Cuproptosis-related immune gene signature predicts clinical benefits from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the major cause of cancer-related death. Immune checkpoint inhibition has become the cornerstone treatment for NSCLC. Cuproptosis is a newly identified form of cell death relying on mitochondrial respiration that might play a role in shaping tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). The clinical significance of cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs) remains unclear and warrant investigation. The current study extracted RNA sequencing profiles and corresponding clinical information from six aggregated datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) repository as the training set, and from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database as the testing set. Cuproptosis-related immune genes (CRIMGs) were obtained through coexpression analysis, univariate Cox regression analysis, and LASSO analysis for overall survival (OS) association analysis. Consensus clustering was employed to divide the subjects into clusters. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression was used to establish the prognostic CRIMG_score from the CRIMGs. A 17-gene prediction signature was established that informed patients' OS both in the training and testing datasets (p < 0.001). The predictive value of the signature in terms of immunotherapeutic responses was assessed in two publicly available NSCLC immunotherapy datasets (POPLAR and OAK studies) and an internal dataset from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (ORIENT-11 study). Patients in the high-risk group displayed worse survival, a characteristic suppressive tumor immune microenvironment, and low immunotherapeutic benefits compared to those in the low-risk group. Collectively, the CRIMG_score established herein could serve as a promising indicator of prognosis and immunotherapeutic response in patients with NSCLC.

Targeting TET2 as a Therapeutic Approach for Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma.

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), a type of malignant lymphoma with unique genomic aberrations, significant clinicopathological features, and poor prognosis, is characterized by immune system dysregulation. Recent sequencing studies have identified recurrent mutations and interactions in tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2), ras homology family member A (RHOA), DNA methyltransferase 3 alpha (DNMT3A), and mitochondrial isocitrate dehydrogenase II (IDH2). Notably, since B-cell lymphomas are frequently observed along with AITL, this review first summarizes its controversial mechanisms based on traditional and recent views. Epigenetic regulation represented by TET2 plays an increasingly important role in understanding the multi-step and multi-lineage tumorigenesis of AITL, providing new research directions and treatment strategies for patients with AITL. Here, we review the latest advances in our understanding of AITL and highlight relevant issues that have yet to be addressed in clinical practice.

PD-1 inhibition plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) or PBC alone in the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

Background: Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a distinctive subtype of non-small cell lung carcinoma that was not well presented in clinical studies. The management of advanced PLELC remains an important, unmet need due to the paucity of high-grade evidence. Herein, we carried out a multicenter, retrospective study to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for patients with advanced PLELC in the first-line setting. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study enrolled patients with advanced PLELC receiving first-line treatment with PD-1 inhibition plus chemotherapy (IO-Chemo group) or chemotherapy alone (Chemo group) in three medical centers in China. The survival outcomes, efficacy, and safety profile were investigated. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). Results: A total of 133 patients were enrolled. PFS was significantly longer in the IO-Chemo group (median 12.8 months [95% CI 5.2-20.4]) than that in the Chemo group (median 7.7 months [95% CI 6.8-8.6]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.48 [95% CI 0.31-0.74]; P=0.001). ORR was 74.5% (95% CI, 63.0-86.1) in the IO-Chemo group and 34.6% (95% CI, 24.1-45.2) in the Chemo group (P<0.001). The median OS was not reached in the IO-Chemo group versus 35.7 months (95% CI 26.7-44.8) in the Chemo group (HR 0.47 [95% CI 0.20-1.07]; P=0.065). Multivariate analysis revealed that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combination was independently associated with longer PFS (HR 0.40 [95% CI 0.25-0.63]; P<0.001). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 36 (65.5%) patients in the IO-Chemo group and 56 (71.8%) patients in the Chemo group, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with advanced PLELC, adding PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor to platinum-based chemotherapy significantly increased PFS and ORR with a tolerable safety profile.

Accuracy of next-generation sequencing for molecular profiling of small specimen of lung cancer: a prospective pilot study of side-by-side comparison.

BACKGROUND: Successful practice of precision medicine in advanced lung cancers relies on therapeutic regimens tailored to individual molecular characteristics. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of small specimens for molecular profiling using next-generation sequencing (NGS). METHODS: Genetic alternations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), status of microsatellite instability (MSI), and expression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) were compared side-by-side between the concurrently obtained core needle biopsy (CNB) and resection specimens in 17 patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancers. RESULTS: DNA yield and library complexity were significantly lower in CNB specimens (both p < 0.01), whereas the insert size, sequencing depth, and Q30 ratio were similar between the matched specimens (all p > 0.05). The total numbers of genetic alternations detected in resection and CNB specimens were 186 and 211, respectively, with 156 alternations in common, yielding a specific concordance rate of 83.9%. The prevalence of mutations in 8 major driver genes was 100% identical between surgical and CNB specimens, though the allele frequency was lower in CNB specimens, with a median underestimation of 57%. Results of TMB were similar (p = 0.547) and MSI status was 100% matched in all paired specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary CNB specimens were suitable for NGS given the satisfactory accuracy when compared to corresponding surgical specimens. NGS results yielding from CNB specimens should be deemed reliable to provide instructive information for the treatment of advanced lung cancers.

A CT-based radiomics model to predict subsequent brain metastasis in patients with ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer undergoing crizotinib treatment.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastasis (BM) comprises the most common reason for crizotinib failure in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We hypothesize that its occurrence could be predicted by a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics model, therefore, allowing for selection of enriched patient populations for prevention therapies. METHODS: A total of 75 eligible patients were enrolled from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between June 2014 and September 2019. The primary endpoint was brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), estimated from the initiation of crizotinib to the date of the occurrence of BM. Patients were randomly divided into two cohorts for model training (n = 51) and validation (n = 24), respectively. A radiomics signature was constructed based on features extracted from chest CT before crizotinib treatment. Clinical model was developed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Log-rank test was performed to describe the difference of BMFS risk. RESULTS: Patients with low radiomics score had significantly longer BMFS than those with higher, both in the training cohort (p = 0.019) and validation cohort (p = 0.048). The nomogram combining smoking history and the radiomics signature showed good performance for the estimation of BMFS, both in the training (concordance index [C-index], 0.762; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.663-0.861) and validation cohort (C-index, 0.724; 95% CI, 0.601-0.847). CONCLUSION: We have developed a CT-based radiomics model to predict subsequent BM in patients with non-brain metastatic NSCLC undergoing crizotinib treatment. Selection of an enriched patient population at high BM risk will facilitate the design of clinical trials or strategies to prevent BM.

Reducing number of target lesions for RECIST1.1 to predict survivals in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing anti-PD1/PD-L1 monotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 provides conventional and standardized response assessment for multiple solid tumors. We investigated the smallest number of target lesions that can be measured without compromising response categorization and survival prediction in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) undergoing anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 125 aNSCLC patients with at least two measurable lesions undergoing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor treatment were retrospectively studied. Tumor measurements allowing up to two lesions per organ and five lesions in total were reviewed. Inter-individual agreement and κ values for inter-method concordance on response status were evaluated based on up to five target lesions versus the largest one through four lesions. C-index was calculated to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of response categorization based on the selected number of target lesions for predicting overall survival (OS). Cox regression analysis was conducted for survival analysis. RESULTS: The highly consistent response assignment (99.2%) could be obtained when measuring the largest two lesions versus up to five lesions. Using the largest two through four lesions produced κ values of 0.986, 1.000 and 1.000 for response assessment, values significantly higher than those obtained when measuring the largest single lesion (κ = 0.850). C-index for overall survival (OS) was similar when assessing the largest one through five lesions, ranging from 0.646 to 0.654. Cox regression analyses showed that radiological response significantly predicted OS, irrespective of the number of target lesions selected. CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the number of target lesions does not affect OS prediction in aNSCLC patients treated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. Considering the high intra-individual and inter-method concordance, using the largest two lesions in total is proposed to assess response.

Efficacy and safety of PD-L1 inhibitors versus PD-1 inhibitors in first-line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-L1 + Chemo) have achieved substantial progress in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, evidence about programmed cell death 1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy (PD-1 + Chemo) in SCLC is relatively lacking. Whether PD-1 inhibitors differ from PD-L1 inhibitors in their clinical outcomes remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety of PD-L1 + Chemo vs PD-1 + Chemo in ES-SCLC by searching PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and major oncology conferences. We examined overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: We included four randomized trials (IMpower133, CASPIAN, KEYNOTE-604, and EA5161) with a total of 1553 patients. Direct comparison showed that PD-L1 + Chemo (PFS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; OS: HR 0.75) and PD-1 + Chemo (PFS: HR 0.72; OS: HR 0.77) significantly prolonged survival time compared with chemotherapy alone. But PD-L1 + Chemo (relative risk [RR]: 1.07) and PD-1 + Chemo (RR: 1.13) were not superior to chemotherapy alone in terms of ORR. Indirect comparison showed no significant difference in clinical efficacy between PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo (OS: HR 0.99; PFS: HR 1.10; ORR: RR 0.95). We further stratified patients according to subgroups in terms of OS. In the subgroup of patients with brain metastasis, PD-L1 + Chemo tended to prolong OS (HR: 0.61, 0.28 to 1.32). There were no significant differences between PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo regarding safety analyses. However, PD-L1 + Chemo exhibited a better safety profile in reducing the risk of treatment discontinuation due to AEs (RR: 0.43, 0.19 to 0.95) and pneumonia (pneumonia of any grade, RR: 0.59, 0.24 to 1.42; pneumonia of grade ≥ 3, RR: 0.37, 0.10 to 1.39). CONCLUSIONS: PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo provided a significant survival benefit relative to chemotherapy alone for ES-SCLC. The efficacy and safety of PD-L1 + Chemo and PD-1 + Chemo were similar based on current evidence.

Hepatotoxicity associated with PD-1 blockade antibodies in cancer patients co-infected with hepatitis B virus.

The use of anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) antibodies in treating malignancies is increasing; however, most registered clinical trials on anti-PD-1 antibodies exclude patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). This retrospective study aimed to assess hepatotoxicity in cancer patients infected with HBV undergoing anti-PD1 antibody therapy and identify the associated risk factors. A total of 301 cancer patients positive for hepatitis B core antibodies (HbcAb) (negative or positive hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]) who received PD-1 inhibitors were enrolled. The primary and secondary endpoints were the incidence rate of hepatotoxicity related to PD-1 inhibitor treatment, and risk factors associated with hepatic toxicity, respectively. Of the enrolled analyzed, 16.9% (n = 51) developed any grade and 4.7% (n = 14) developed grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity, respectively. Higher risk for any-grade hepatotoxicity development was associated with sero-positive HBsAg (OR = 6.30; P = 0.020), existence of liver involvement (OR = 2.10; P = 0.030), and detectable baseline HBV DNA levels (OR = 2.39; P = 0.012). Patients with prophylactic antiviral therapy decreased hazard for the incidence of grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity (OR = 0.10; P = 0.016). Our results suggested chronic (HBsAg-positive)/resolved (HBsAg-negative and HBcAb-positive) HBV-infected cancer patients are at an increased risk of hepatotoxicity following PD-1 inhibitor therapy. Cancer patients should be tested for HBsAg/HBcAb prior to the commencement of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. For patients with chronic/resolved HBV infection, ALT/AST and HBV DNA should be closely monitored during the whole immunotherapy period.